10x12 another thing (fidge logic, creepy)

[citrus_java]

So wait - the whole premise in the beginning, of a monster who takes people and leaves behind their clothes.
Why.
Why would Hansel stop, in a public place, to strip down unconscious children and leave behind their clothes,
then produce from somewhere age and size appropriate clothes (he'd need to carry a collection) and dress unconscious children on the street - or drag them naked away? WTF?

Why even bother dressing them at all? I mean - they're bad guys, why bother dressing the kids for a day or two only? OK, naked can be very uncomfortable, but why not just take them in their clothes? Particularly since leaving the clothes pints to the disappearance.

Also. Underoos. How does Sam know, and *seriously*, Hansel dressed Dean in underwear? Ick! I'll just hope that was a joke on Sam's part.

Comments

[frozen_delight]

I think we were supposed to believe that it was all part of the flowery flowers magic, but you're right, it seemed pretty creepy.

As for how Sam knew - here's why.

[citrusjava.livejournal.com]

That makes sense....

But why would the magic leave behind their clothes?
Is it like - they're smaller as adults so the extra material is turned into clothes...?
And why these clothes? Is it like - something to blend in wearing...?

[tabaqui]

Network tv + naked children do not mix. So, you know - clothes.

And i'd say yes, it was a joke, since they don't actually make Underoos in wee!Dean's size, it was just Sam trying to take the piss out of Dean for his 'size' comment.